The standard
Certification standards
- Criteria version
- 2025.12
- Status
- In force from 11 March 2026 · Text published 10 September 2026
- Issued by
- TFG Certification Pty Ltd
- Cited in
- Certification Services Terms 2.1
1Scope
This page sets out what Trusted Firms Global certifies, the values a firm or adviser must meet, and how a score is computed and corrected. Clause 2.1 of the Certification Services Terms refers to this page.
This is criteria version 2025.12, in force from 11 March 2026; its text was published on 10 September 2026. Each clause can be cited by its number and version, for example “Standard 3.2, version 2025.12”.
Every current credential issued by Trusted Firms Global was checked against this text on 26 September 2026.
2Firm certification
Criteria common to all tiers
These criteria are the same at every tier.
- Coverage
- The survey list is built from the firm's client records. The response rate is the share of surveys sent that received a response. Clients the firm holds no email address for cannot be surveyed.
- Survey basis
- The firm's complete invoiced client population for the assessment period. No firm-chosen sample.
- Minimum responses
- 250
- Minimum response rate
- No minimum. The response rate is reported to the firm.
- Assessment period
- Twelve months to the assessment date
- Validity
- Twelve months from issue
Minimum score
The minimum score differs by tier.
Small firms
Firms with fewer than 250 invoiced clients in the assessment period qualify on coverage rather than volume, assessed over the 24 months to the assessment date:the survey list drawn from the firm's complete invoiced client population, a response rate of at least 40% across the window (total responses divided by total invitations, so a client surveyed in each year counts in each), and no fewer than 100 responses.
Managing principals
For a firm's managing principal, Trusted Firms may assess on the full period since the firm joined the program where the twelve-month sample is too small.
Assessment
Firm certification is assessed by Trusted Firms against these values on the complete verified record. The assessment date and values are shown on the verification page.
3Certification tiers
The certification tier reflects what Trusted Firms Global is willing to vouch for publicly. Each tier is a stronger public claim than the one below. Tier describes the strength of the evidence behind the claim, not the quality of the firm.
Standard
The firm submits to independent measurement- Required of the firm
- Independent measurement by Client Culture on an annual cycle
- The firm's complete invoiced client population (2.1). At this tier the firm may supply it as a CRM export or a prepared list
- At least 250 responses and NPS ≥ 70
- Verified by Trusted Firms Global
- Independence of collection. The completeness of the client list is not verified at this tier.
- Verification method
- Client Culture integrity review: client-list shrinkage monitoring, statistical outlier flagging and response-rate monitoring (manual review).
- Public claim
- Independent measurement and certified status. No public score, because completeness is not verified.
Verified
The measurement is structurally protected from selection- Required of the firm
- All Standard requirements
- The client list drawn from the firm's billing records, supplied by its finance function, or, where it does not bill per engagement, its register of fee-paying clients
- Supplied by the firm's operations or finance function, not fee-earners
- Measurement frequency proportionate to the client base
- Verified by Trusted Firms Global
- Source. The client list is checked against the firm's billing records or register of fee-paying clients, and year-over-year changes in its size are reconciled.
- Verification method
- Reconciliation of the firm's client record, with coverage review.
- Public claim
- Client list drawn from a verifiable client record. The score is published.
Gold
Sustained rigour with closed-loop accountability- Required of the firm
- All Verified requirements
- Every client given the opportunity to provide feedback each cycle, sustained across every cycle for a full year
- Structured follow-up of every detractor, evidenced in the platform
- NPS ≥ 80
- Verified by Trusted Firms Global
- Sustained coverage and frequency across the year, and detractor follow-up. Where there were no detractors, the record says so.
- Verification method
- Manual review (mandatory). Detractor follow-up reviewed in the platform.
- Public claim
- The highest level of process transparency. The score is published.
Tier comparison
Only the criteria that differ between tiers.
| Criterion | Standard | Verified | Gold |
|---|---|---|---|
| NPS threshold | ≥ 70 | ≥ 70 | ≥ 80 |
| Client list source | Prepared list or CRM export | Billing records or register of fee-paying clients | As Verified, sustained |
| Client list | Not verified | Checked against the firm's records | Checked against the firm's records, each year |
| Public score | No | Yes | Yes |
| Measurement cycle | Annual | Proportionate to client base | Proportionate, sustained twelve months |
| Coverage check | Shrinkage and outlier monitoring | Reconciled against firm size | Sustained every cycle |
| Data path | Firm-submitted | Operations or finance, not fee-earners | Operations or finance, not fee-earners |
| Detractor follow-up | – | – | Structured, evidenced in the platform |
| Verification method | Manual integrity review | Reconciliation and coverage review | Manual review (mandatory) |
Fee ledger
A fee ledger is an export of all invoices in the assessment period from the firm's billing or practice management system, supplied by the firm's finance function. Duplicate lines may be merged; no client may be removed.
4Adviser credential
Trusted Adviser
- Survey basis
- The adviser's clients within the firm's complete invoiced client population for the assessment period, as the responsible adviser. No chosen sample.
- Minimum response rate
- 15%
- Minimum responses
- 15
- Minimum score
- NPS ≥ 45
- Assessment period
- Twelve months to the assessment date
- Validity
- Twelve months from issue
Eligibility
Trusted Adviser credentials are available only to advisers within a firm that holds a current Trusted Firms Global certification, at any tier. The firm's certification establishes the survey basis (the complete client population, independently measured), and the adviser standard is an evidence test on the adviser's own clients within it. A sole practitioner is assessed as a small firm (2.3).
5What is published
The record
A credential is a point-in-time assessment against this standard, and its verification page is the record of that assessment. A firm record states the response count, the assessment window, the basis of the client list and, at Verified and Gold, the score; an adviser record states that the Trusted Adviser standard was met. Both are stated as at the certification date and fixed there. The record is not live. It is corrected only in place, with the correction visible.
The living surfaces
The reviews pages and the widget are the living surfaces. They show all-time figures, labelled “since [month year]” and refreshed on the schedule stated on the page, with what clients value most, adviser pages and consented reviews. They come with the reviews service; the score's publication does not depend on it, because the record publishes it.
Count and window
Every figure carries its count and its window. Nothing on the record is suppressed, and the firm does not choose the window: twelve months is the assessment window (24 months on the small-firm basis); all-time, labelled, is the window on reviews pages. Both are legitimate when labelled; neither is legitimate unlabelled.
One public score
One public score: the average client score out of 10. NPS is the assessment metric, seen by the firm on the platform, and appears on the record only as the test (“Standard met: NPS ≥ 70”). A score is displayed only where the response count is at least 30, always with its count and window; firm records at Verified and Gold clear that by definition. Firm records do not show the response rate; it is reported to the firm. An adviser's credential record states only that the Trusted Adviser standard was met; the thresholds are published in this standard (4.1). Where the firm subscribes to reviews pages, an adviser at a Verified or Gold firm shows their all-time average score and number of reviews; at a Standard firm, reviews only. Reviews pages show the all-time score at 30 or more responses and otherwise say “score published at 30 responses”.
6How the standard is applied
Issuance
The standards are code. An assessment function computes the figures from the verified response record held by Client Culture, never from a separately maintained copy, stores the assessment and gates issuance. A credential is issued only when the assessment passes. There is no operator override. Credentials issued by Client Culture before 11 March 2026 are identified as such on their record. Issuance is supervised by Greg Tilse, Managing Director.
Corrections
A correction is made in place and remains visible as a correction.
Fees
Fees have no bearing on certification outcomes.
Review of a decision
If a firm disagrees with a decision, it can ask for reconsideration within 30 days. This is free and answered within 10 business days. If it still disagrees, the decision goes to an independent reviewer drawn from the ACICA panel of arbitrators and agreed by both parties. If they cannot agree within 10 business days, ACICA makes the appointment. The firm pays all costs of the review, including ACICA's fees, and the reviewer's decision is final. For a request for independent review made before 24 October 2026, Trusted Firms Global bears the reviewer's costs.
The binding wording is clause 6.2 of the Certification Services Terms. The published standards are not open to review; their application is.
Changes
Changes to these standards are published on this page with at least 90 days' notice. A change does not withdraw a credential already issued. Editorial revisions that do not change a requirement are made without a new version number.
Change notes
- 26 September 2026, editorial correction to 6.1: a credential is issued only when the assessment passes, with no operator override, reflecting the platform. The criteria are unchanged.
Safeguards
- Coverage: the survey list is built from the firm's client records
- A minimum response count for every credential, and a minimum response rate for adviser credentials and on the small-firm basis
- Manual integrity review at Standard: client-list shrinkage, statistical outlier flagging and response-rate monitoring
- Reconciliation of the firm's own client record, with coverage checks, at Verified and Gold
- Year-over-year coverage and shrinkage monitoring to detect selective omission
- Annual renewal, with Gold sustaining coverage across every cycle for a full year
- Public verification pages, which create accountability
7Six standards of professional service excellence
Certification is built on six service standards that reflect what clients consistently value in professional services firms. They are assessed through independent feedback.
Responsiveness and reliability
Clients receive timely, reliable responses appropriate to the urgency of their needs.
Clarity and communication
Clients understand advice and feel kept informed throughout the engagement.
Expertise and proactive value delivery
Clients see value beyond the transaction: advice that anticipates needs and creates forward momentum.
Relationship and trust-building
Clients trust their advisers personally and professionally, and feel the relationship is valued.
Service accountability and follow-through
Clients see promises delivered and issues resolved. Commitments are tracked and honoured.
Staff recognition and celebration of excellence
Staff delivering great service are recognised and celebrated, building a culture of service excellence from within.
8Common questions
Why is no score published at Standard?
Because completeness is not vouched at that tier. A score drawn from a client list that has not been checked against the firm’s records is not comparable to one that has. It could read high simply because unhappy clients were never in the file. Publishing it would be unfair to firms that did the additional work, so at Standard the public claim is independence and certified status rather than a number.
What is the difference between Standard, Verified and Gold?
They differ in what Trusted Firms Global is willing to vouch for publicly. Standard vouches for independent measurement. Verified adds that the client list came from a verifiable client record the firm did not assemble for the survey, and that TFG checked it against that record, which unlocks a public score. Gold adds that this was sustained across every cycle for a full year, with evidenced detractor follow-up.
Does a higher tier mean a better firm?
No. Tier reflects the strength of the evidence behind the public claim, not the quality of the firm. A Standard firm may deliver excellent service; what differs is how much Trusted Firms Global is prepared to assert publicly on the available evidence.
Who decides whether a firm meets the standard?
Trusted Firms Global sets the standards and awards credentials. The client feedback underlying them is collected and measured by Client Culture, independently of the firms certified. Issuance is gated by the assessment function (6.1) and supervised by Greg Tilse, Managing Director. A decision can be reconsidered, then reviewed by an independent reviewer drawn from the ACICA panel of arbitrators, under 6.4. Standards are reviewed annually and certification must be renewed each year.
Apply for assessment
A firm is assessed at the tier its evidence supports. Fees have no bearing on the outcome.